新闻中心 
防守效率排名出炉引争议（防守效率榜单发布惹热议）
{$eyou.field.add_time|MyDate='Y-m-d',###}
浏览次数：{eyou:arcclick /}次
返回列表Evaluating sports statistics
I’m considering different methods to evaluate game performance, like methodology and sample calculations. There’s a lot to adjust for, including opponent strength and garbage time. I might suggest various options like explaining defensive efficiency or analyzing a specific league or season if the user has data. I’ll also provide a concise summary of common controversies, such as different possession formulas, opponent shooting luck, and issues with small sample sizes or injuries.Providing coding assistance
I can offer a simple Python snippet to compute defensive ratings from a CSV of team game logs. The instructions say to keep formatting light unless the user specifically asks for more, so I should be concise. It might be better to begin with a brief explanation and then inquire about the specific league and what the user needs help with. Oh, and I’ll need to respond in Chinese!
你是说哪一项防守效率榜？NBA、CBA，还是五大联赛的足球数据？不同榜单口径差很多，容易引争议。先给你快速梳理常见“排名不一致/不服气”的原因，你看看要不要按某一联赛细算或复核：
- 口径差异：是否剔除垃圾时间、加时是否计入、主客场合并方式不同。
- 回合数估算：用的回合公式不同（箱分估算 vs. 回放级别精算），会直接影响DefRtg=失分/百回合。
- 赛程强度：是否做对手强弱校正（对强队打得多，裸数据会吃亏）。
- 投篮运气：对手三分命中波动大，是否做回归或“无干扰/受干扰”质量校正。
- 篮板与犯规口径：是否把“队篮板/队失误”纳入，是否区分非投篮犯规、清掉无意义的末节犯规。
- 阵容与可用性：是否做“在某核心在场/不在场”的调整；伤病导致的样本不稳定。
- 时间窗口：小样本期（赛季初/最近10场）波动大；跨月/全季口径不同。
你想怎么继续？
- 指定联赛+赛季（或链接榜单），我帮你对齐口径并解释差异。
- 把球队场次级数据给我（或我写脚本抓取），我按“去垃圾时间+赛程强度+三分回归”重算一版排名。
- 做一页可视化（DefRtg vs. 对手强度/对手3P%），直观看“真防守”和“运气”成分。
- 只要一段通俗总结，我按你指定的两三支争议球队写点评。
